RIP Tupac Amaur Shakur (1971-1996) Essays - Gangsta Rappers

Tear Tupac Amaur Shakur (1971-1996) Cover me smilin, with G's in my pocket, host a gathering a my memorial service, let each rapper rock it, let tha diggers that I usta know from route before kiss me from my head to my toe..tell all my individuals I'm a Ridah, no one cries when we kick the bucket, we bans, let me ride.- Tupac Shakur (1971-1996) His name was Tupac Amaru Shakur he was conceived on June 16, 1971 he was a quarter century old when he was slaughtered In las Vegas ,Nevada On 10 13, 1996 He estimated 5' 7 tall and weighed 165 lbs. He was a rapper/on-screen character. He was gifted when he put his psyche to something.Some might express want to hit the dance floor with death. 2Pac was a rapper/on-screen character who recorded various records an assumed head jobs in a couple of films. He sold all the more then ten million records and made millions from his motion pictures this is a man that was naturally introduced to viciousness and went the other way by doing everything everything his folks didn't do. 2Pac went to workmanship school in the concentrated of touchy verse. He was shot outside the Tyson battle by an idea to be east coast rival. A white Cadillac moved up on the vehicle that he was celebrating in and terminated 13 rounds at him while he had his entire chest area out of the bay window. A few people imagine this may be a sort defensive guardianship or an exposure stunt.

Group Work Engaging in Knowledge Transfer

Question: Talk about the Group Workfor Engaging in Knowledge Transfer. Answer: Presentation Gathering work is basically when a gathering of understudies or individuals progress in the direction of a typical reason as one. Inside the learning procedure, legitimate connections among understudies are basic in the learning procedure, (Brown et al., 2014). Such a conventional method of learning is said to help confidence and the capacity of understudies to learn most angles through friend educators. In numerous open establishments, this recipe is by all accounts working practically speaking. Be that as it may, there are the breaking down elements of this method of learning. In this way, it is for the said glitches that my paper talks only on the issues that are disregarded about the entire thought of working in gatherings. My article will for the most part detail and disclose the reasons with respect to why we ought to either empower group works or debilitate bunch work in learning foundations. Gathering work faces lethargy from people. A few understudies are applying less endeavors and leaving the vast majority of the work to the included individuals from the group. Working in bunches encourages raising a whole give task where everybody invests their energy towards a shared objective, (Gregory and Thorley, 2013). The above sort of thought restricts a person to pull the entirety of their weight altogether to the achievement of a specific errand. Something else to consider is that in a gathering work individuals offer their own perspectives which are talked about and in this way ensure a high caliber of data on a given point. Be that as it may, the individual perspectives on people may not be reality relating a topic of conversation. The above conversation isn't to deny the way that gathering work reinforces data along these lines increment the unwavering quality of data however to show how it very well may be adverse in one manner subsequently wrecking us from that learning thought process. Gathering work is inclined to struggle. The contention between colleagues disheartens people from contributing in a learning procedure. The contentions may emerge because of differences about certain realities. (Robes, et al., 2015) recommends that absence of well mannered conflicts with perspectives on others prompts a contention thus making the more fragile understudies dread to let some circulation into their perspectives. Subsequently making the gathering work extremely undesirable to the learning procedure. Also, Wolfhagen is the way that, instead of individual examinations where one can't strife with self-in regards to confronting a question of focuses, a gathering work presents the test. Then again, Van Der Vleuten includes that singular commitment emphatically gets debilitated when other colleagues neglect to offer in their input but hope to acquire from the general exertion, (Dolmans et al., 2015). It is for such an explanation, that gathering works if not satisfactorily con trolled may prompt a brutality culture rather than a learning society. Since it debilitates particularly the frail from taking an interest, and it likewise makes others torpid inside the conversations since one's thought may shift from the general gathering's impression of seeing realities subsequently lead to such a contention. The gathering work can be ruled by an individual or specific people. Tyrannical happens in the gathering in situations where different individuals from a gathering become dynamic in responding to questions and the general exercises of the gathering to the detriment of different individuals who need to contribute. In concurrence with (Hillyard et al., 2010), the nearness of exceptionally dynamic benefactors inside the gathering's conversations is extremely hindering to a specific gathering. Since such individuals limit the capacity of some non-dynamic individuals from such a gathering to take an interest, they ought to be debilitated. Such, in this manner, mutilates the entire instrument of gathering work, all the more so its pith. Another type of tyrannical is the part of Littig, (Hillyard et al., 2010). The creator recommends that it is entirely expected to encounter individuals from a gathering intruding on others in a discussion to air their own view relating a subject of conversa tion thus ignoring that of the previous speaker. Some even proceed to garbage what the speaker has said in an impolite way. Such a bad habit decreases spirit in individuals. For example, in the event that the individual talking isn't as knowledgeable about open talking, at that point the individual may feel outside of any relevant connection to the subject at hand subsequently decrease their spirit. Such conduct is very harming particularly to the entire learning procedure of a person. Furthermore, another part of mastery by an individual is when not many individuals take positions of authority inside the gathering. Such a bad habit makes, that issue of disparity inside the gathering consequently may cause other colleagues to feel undervalued or even disregarded. When there are predominant individuals inside the gathering, the learning procedure meddled with; individuals won't have the option to get familiar with certain parts of the subjects of conversation for example how and why things complete, (Brandler et al., 2015). Since the majority of the exercises will be done in such individuals' way, not in a way everybody is agreeable. Thus, absence of legitimate authority inside a gathering is another explanation with regards to why gathering work isn't a compelling investigation process. Absence of good authority is considered as a formula to the difficulties of having a compelling collaboration, (Fukada et al., 2017). The part of preference inside the gathering is a major issue in gatherings. Issues, for example, time assignment to various individuals present an issue. The group heads grant a few individuals additional time when contrasted with different partners, (Sadath, et al., 2016). Thusly, causing a few individuals not to feel helpful or even needed inside such a gathering. Such a demonstration diminishes the yield of a gathering since not every person was given a similar chance to take an interest in the gathering work. Such a propensity can likewise be seen when the pioneer is in help to a specific gathering's perspective without appropriately giving equivalent opportunity to investigate the topic of con versation. Another method of which poor administration is an issue to the learning procedure is when there is when there is an absence of decency and regard of assessment. Such causes people to feel threatened during the gathering works thus stop to take part in dynamic conversations, in this manner, acting among the explanations behind poor yield quality. Another explanation is the point at which the pioneer has no influence over the gathering's exercises. For example, when there are individuals from the gathering that feels increasingly better than the others and the gathering head invests no amounts of energy in containing such practices, for example, discourteously interfering with a speaker and possibly over speeding the conversations that a few individuals from the gatherings are deserted slacking in regards to understanding the ideas. When there is no dynamic administration inside the gathering, there is a probability that the group will fall since there would be clashes insi de the gathering. Henceforth genuine administration assumes a fundamental job in group works, (Cohen and Lotan, 2014). The entirety of the referenced parts of absence of legitimate initiative inside the group, an unmistakable signs that when the board work has no one to direct it, the entire learning process utilizing the gathering works is simply yet a delusion of the realities that gathering works are intended to build the adsorption levels of understudies, help certainty and empower a well disposed learning space, (Arends, 2014) Therefore in as much as we are urged to take part in bunch conversations, we should likewise take sensible measures to guaranteeing that our consultations have less of apathy, decreased clash, control and appropriate authority from individuals who share a similar gathering. With such measures, the gathering work can be exceptionally helpful to understudies. References Arends, R. (2014). Figuring out how to instruct. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Brandler, S. what's more, Roman, C.P., 2015. Gathering work: Skills and procedures for viable mediations. Routledge. Earthy colored, L. K., Angus, D. C., Marin, M. G., Balmes, J. R., Barker, A. F., Ewart, G. ... Nathanson, I. T. (2014). Instructing by standards. Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A. (2014). Planning Group work: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom Third Edition. Instructors College Press. Robes, D.H., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I.H. what's more, Van Der Vleuten, C.P., 2015. Problem?based learning: Future difficulties for instructive practice and exploration. Clinical Education, 39(7), pp.732-741. Fukada, Y., Murphey, T., Falout, J., Fukuda, T. (2017). Fundamental Motivational Group Dynamics: A 3-Year Panel Study. In Essential Competencies for English-medium University instructing (pp. 249-266). Springer International Publishing. Gregory, R. what's more, Thorley, L. eds., 2013. Utilizing bunch based learning in advanced education. Routledge. Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D. what's more, Littig, P., 2010. College understudies' mentalities about learning in little gatherings after successive interest. Dynamic Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), pp.9-20. Long, M. H., Porter, P. A. (2013). Gathering work, interlanguage talk, and second language obtaining. TESOL Quarterly, 207-228. Sadath, A., Muralidhar, D., Varambally, S. what's more, Gangadhar, B.N., 2016. Does Group Intervention Have Benefits on Expressed Emotion and Social Support in Careers of Persons with First Episode Psychosis? Social Work in Mental Health, (simply acknowledged).

Ledership

What is initiative? As per Shockley-Zalabak (2009) Leadership is a procedure of directing people, gatherings, and whole association in setting up objectives and continuing activity to help objectives. What precisely is implied by administration? There are truly several definitions about who a pioneer is and what is considered as administration. Every definition may shift starting with one individual then onto the next and may change from one circumstance to the next. For instance we may call an individual a pioneer in light of the persons’ political race to the administration of an institution.Other times we state he/she isn't a pioneer since he/she doesn't show authority practices expected of the of a pioneer. As it were, we anticipated administration from the genuine situation of the administration, however when that president doesn't display initiative practices, we state that the president isn't a pioneer. As indicated by Yukl, (2002). The meaning of initiative is self-ass ertive and emotional. A few definitions are more helpful than others, yet there is no â€Å"correct† definition. Authority hypotheses: Theories are generally helpful for impacting practice when they recommend new manners by which occasions and circumstances can be perceived.Fresh knowledge might be given by concentrating consideration on conceivable interrelationship that the training has neglected to see, which can be additionally investigated and tried through observational research. In the event that the outcome is a superior comprehension of training, the hypothesis â€practice hole is fundamentally diminished for those concerned. (Hughes and Bush, 1991, p. 234). The characteristic hypothesis This hypothesis previously surfaced in the compositions of early Greeks and Romans and is predominant today among the individuals who accept that initiative can't be developed.This hypothesis expected that pioneers has natural attributes that made them viable, incredible pioneers w ere viewed as brought into the world with the capacity for authority, so it is it is possible that you have administration characteristics or you don’t . As per Shockley †zalabak (2009) hypothesis of administration, that pioneers had intrinsic attributes that made them viable; is usually alluded to as the â€Å"great man† hypothesis Leadership characteristics hypothesis is the possibility that individuals are brought into the world with certain character attribute or characteristics and since qualities are related with capable initiative, it expect that in the event that you could distinguish eople with the right attributes, you will have the option to recognize pioneers and individuals with authority potential. It is viewed as that we are conceived normally with attributes as a major aspect of our character; this hypothesis in synopsis accepts that pioneers are brought into the world not made Criticism Researches were done to characterize qualities or character t rademark that best anticipate the successful pioneer. Rundown of around eighty qualities or trademark were gotten however attribute approach neglected to characterize obviously a steady arrangement of trademark related with compelling leadership.Even the idea of what is viable stays open to address. This hypothesis doesn't demonstrate a far reaching clarification to how pioneers cooperate with supporters and address the issues of explicit conditions. While genuinely others can be conceived pioneers, it is off base to sum up by saying that administration qualities are in brought into the world and unchangeable. It’s genuine a considerable lot of our manners and propensities are impacted by our characters and the manner in which we are conceived. Nonetheless, the vast majority perceived that it is feasible for somebody to change their character attribute for the worse.Someone known for being straightforward can figure out how to be misleading, the entire thought of saying someb ody was â€Å"corrupted† depends on the way that individuals can learn awful qualities. On the off chance that individuals can learn character qualities and become not quite the same as the manner in which they were conceived normally characteristics can be learnt also. An individual who is inclined to being unscrupulous can figure out how to be completely forthright. An individual who dodges dangers can figure out how to face challenge. It may not be simple, however it tends to be finished. STYLE APPROACHES Leadership style approach concentrates on the leaders’ conduct. Initiative style is the blend of qualities, abilities, and practices pioneers use as they collaborate with adherents: (Lussier, 2004) Though administration style depends on authority aptitudes and initiative characteristics, administration practices is the significant part. This is supposed to be the third way to deal with initiative examinations, a reliable example of conduct is the thing that describ es a pioneer. â€Å"In moving the investigation of initiative to leaders’ style or practices, the style approach extended the investigation of administration to different contexts† (North house, 2004).According to Shockley-Zalabak (2009) style approach or speculations endeavor to distinguish and mastermind the general methodologies pioneers use to accomplish objectives. These methodologies are believed to be based or a leader’s suspicion about what spurs individuals to achieve objectives. This hypothesis endeavors to distinguish a scope of general methodologies pioneers use to impact objective accomplishment. These methodologies are conjectured to be founded on the leader’s suspicion about what inspires individuals to achieve goals.Particular approaches additionally reflect complex connections among the individual attributes of the pioneer. Top among the style speculations is the imperious to-popularity based continuum previously proposed by Ralph while a nd Ronald Lippitt (1960). Imperious style of pioneer is a pioneer who settles on choices with little impact from others Shockley-Zalabak (2009). The pioneer that displays this conduct settles on the choices, provides requests to representatives, and is continually administering his subordinate. This pioneer instructs others and for the most part upholds sanctions against the individuals who decided not to consent. He sees his adherents as basic for objective accomplishment yet for the most part feels little obligation regarding representative needs and relationship Shockley-zalabak (2009). Analysis Research proposes that imperiously driven gatherings produce more in amount than justly drove gatherings, however that the quality yield is better when more popular government is rehearsed. For the most part with dictatorial styles the drove are disturbed so they simply do as they are told not on the grounds that they have the enthusiasm of the establishment on a basic level or on the gro unds that they appreciate working.Democratic-Shockley-Zalabak (2009) states that this style of pioneers is the one that includes devotees in dynamic. The pioneer that displays this conduct advances shared choice, collaboration, and doesn't regulate his subordinates intently. He accept supporters can partake in dynamic, they attempt to make an atmosphere in which critical thinking can occur while safeguarding relational connections. Unmistakably these authority styles are opposite’s end of a continuum.As such, it’s simple to imagine that a leader’s administration style s follows between those finishes. Analysis When a pioneer is law based on occasion his different partners in authority positions can take a gander at him as a weakling and furthermore the subordinates may exploit and needs to be discourteous. Free enterprise style-Here the pioneer acts as non-pioneer. People and gatherings are relied upon to settle on their own choices on account of a hand-off meth odology from the pioneer. The free enterprise pioneer is a case of non-pioneer. This pioneer anticipates that gatherings and people should make their own decision.He gives data just when ask by bunch individuals. Analysis The achievement of the gathering relies enormously upon the capacities of the gathering and gatherings individuals ability to work with practically no administration. On the off chance that the gatherings individuals comprise of individuals that need a push to do things they won’t have the option to accomplish a lot. Ruined administration According to Shockley-Zalabak (2009) this style is described by low worry for relational connections and assignment achievement. This pioneer makes barely any endeavors to impact individuals towards undertaking or goals.He despises initiative obligations and lets others assume the liability that legitimately has a place with the pioneer. This pioneer is generally awkward with initiative and mentally opposes the requirement for it. Analysis These pioneers might be fundamentally liable for the disappointment of the gathering. Widely appealing administration This is a style of pioneer who adjusts task and peoples’ concerns; ordinarily alluded to as undermined initiative or the board. The pioneer arranges and bargains to accomplish functional understandings and headings for activity Country club the executives This is a style of pioneers who accentuates relational relationship to the detriment of objective accomplishment the pioneer here needs to be loved and have bunch adherents who feel upheld by the pioneer. He gives a relational relationship bond that is low on task accentuation and high in relational help Criticism He may need an assignment achieved yet won't find a way to underscore this component to other people, if individuals are not profoundly task situated; he winds up accomplishing their work. As opposed to demanding that the workers show exclusive requirements of execution. These pione ers may not build up the capacities of the individuals under them.Team administration: This is the hypothetical perfect: group pioneers display high worry for both errand and relational connections by accentuating objective achievement while supporting individuals, it encourages a feeling of â€Å"we† with elite measures. This initiative offer dynamic and takes a stab at critical thinking intended to tackle as opposed to delay issue, it regards distinctive perspective and worth assorted variety as long as it adds to the collective endeavor. Analysis Team individuals who bolster each other however need more capacity or data to take a shot at issues won't have the option to create a great choice.

To Kill a Mockingbird Study Guide Essays - Literature, Film

To Kill a Mockingbird Study Guide Portray the accompanying individuals from the Finch family: Atticus - Scout and Jem's dad, a legal counselor in Maycomb plummeted from an old nearby family. A single man with a dry comical inclination, Atticus has imparted in his youngsters his solid feeling of ethical quality and equity. He is one of only a handful barely any occupants of Maycomb focused on racial uniformity . Scout - he storyteller and hero of the story. Jean Louise Scout Finch lives with her dad, Atticus, her sibling, Jem, and their dark cook, Calpurnia, in Maycomb. She is canny and, by the guidelines of her time and spot, a boyish girl. Scout has a contentious streak (component) and an essential confidence in the decency of the individuals in her locale . Jem - Scout's sibling and consistent mate toward the start of the story. Jeremy Atticus Jem Finch is something of a commonplace American kid, declining to withdraw from dares and fantasizing about playing football . Calpurnia - The Finches' dark cook. Calpurnia is a harsh drill sergeant and the kids' scaffold between the white world and her own dark network. What are the games that Jam and Scout play with Dill? Scout, Jem and Dill utilize their creative mind to reproduce and carry on well known motion pictures and plays. They do this for quite a while, before making their own accounts. In the end, they make anecdotes about Arthur Radley (AKA Boo Radley) and are intrigued by his secrecy. Which spurs them to mess around of grandiosity around the Radley place, which gets to some degree perilous. Depict every one of the accompanying neighbors: Mr. Avery - Is an overweight neighbor that is profoundly su perstitious. He accuses the kids' terrible conduct' for the day off. Mrs. Dubose - An older, cantankerous, bigot lady who lives close to the Finches. In spite of the fact that Jem accepts that Mrs. Dubose is an altogether awful lady, Atticus respects her for the boldness with which she fights her morphine enslavement. Ms. Maudie - The Finches' neighbor, a harshly toned widow, and an old companion of the family. Miss Maudie is nearly a similar age as Atticus' more youthful sibling, Jack. She shares Atticus' energy for equity and is the youngsters' closest companion among others. What do we find out about the Cunningham's? The Cunninghams are perhaps the most unfortunate family in Maycomb. They don't acknowledge anything from individuals, on the off chance that they can't bring it back. We find out about the Cunninghams through (essentially) Walter Cunningham. For instance, Walter wouldn't take a quarter from Miss Caroline in light of the fact that he could return it back to her. Alsoin the start of thestory,Scout asks Atticus for what good reason the Mr. Cunningham drops off wood andAtticus says thatishis method of taking care of individuals. What are the extremely significant things that Scout learned at school on her first day? Scout gets significant instruction on her first day of school, yet a large portion of it concerns withhow to manage others as opposed to with educational issues. First she gains from Jem that both of them ought to have little contact with each other at school. Scout learns numerous things about Miss Caroline: that she hails from northern Alabama, a region loaded up with people of no foundation; that she thinks instructing should just be finished by instructors; that she trusts Atticus has been causing harm to Scout by perusing to her; that cursive composing ought not be scholarly until some other time than the primary evaluation; andthat Miss Caroline has never stumbled into cooties (head lice) previously. Above all, Scout takes in exercises from Calpurnia about how to treat a house visitor; and, from Atticus,how it is ideal to move into his skin first before making a decision about an individual. She likewise learns the meaning of bargain and that it is so critical to Atticus that she get a government funded instruction. Scenes in the story that include the Radley Place up until this point, and there noteworthiness: In Chapter One, Dill, Jem, and Scout initially start to ponder about Boo Radley. Dill was the first to pick up the fixation in observing and finding increasingly about Boo Radley This startles Scout and Jem, however enchants Dill. (Pages 12-15) Dill is persuaded they should cajole Boo out; Jem and Scout are certain he will slaughter himself. In any case, when a challenge is made

Writing Headings For College Application Essay

Writing Headings For College Application EssayIn the days before essay writing software became a staple in every home, you'd have to rely on your common sense in order to write a solid, engaging, and impactful essay for your college application. You'd have to know the contents of the essay before writing it, and it would be up to you to practice with the sample until you had the fundamentals down. Today, however, we've got so many options at our disposal that it's easy to find the right tool for the job - it's all in the head.If you want to know how to write a college application essay, you'll need to keep certain factors in mind. It won't do you any good to start writing with the subject line in mind or starting out with a preconceived idea of what you want to say. While the ability to express yourself is certainly an important part of writing an essay, you'll want to keep your thoughts focused on the end result you're hoping to get when it comes to your college application. Keep th is in mind when you're looking to use heading for college application essay tips.Getting an objective and relevant perspective out of a person can be difficult - and intimidating. While each applicant has a unique story to tell, everyone has a unique perspective and needs to be heard. Headings for college application essay are just one way to tell a story that will get the point across and help you be successful with your college applications.While there are a lot of students today who don't seem to care what school they apply to, you should still be able to find guidance for writing a compelling essay based on your personal experiences, interests, and other considerations. These pointers can help you overcome any preconceived notions about what college is like and help you get into a great school that will truly be a positive experience. Learning how to write a college application essay will help you to build the best possible impression on an admissions officer as you present your unique background and character. Creating heading for college application essay is just one of the many things you'll want to consider when you're trying to present your personal self. Your personal story is the most important aspect of your application, and you'll want to make sure you put your best foot forward when you're writing it. The style you choose to express yourself will depend entirely on how you feel about yourself - the more confident you are, the better you'll be able to show off your qualities and ideas in the essay.When it comes to writing essays for different colleges, one of the most important elements you'll want to consider is your passion and how that relates to the school itself. You may not realize this, but some admissions officers and admissions counselors actually look for this factor when they are looking to weed out applications. Whether or not you believe this to be true, you'll want to have an understanding of how your enthusiasm can be expressed in t he essay.Writing a college application essay is easy once you know how to get the right headings. You'll find that there are many essay samples that will give you great instructions on what you need to include and how to keep it all together. This will make it easy for you to find the proper essay heading for college application essay that will get you noticed as an academic prospect.Remember, heading for college application essay is a process, and it doesn't happen overnight. By looking at other essays you've written, and seeing how to make headings work for you, you'll be well on your way to producing a quality and effective essay. Be careful, though - there are some 'headings' out there that aren't appropriate, so be careful what you choose to insert into your essay.

Research Paper Writing Services Reviews

Research Paper Writing Services ReviewsIf you are a writer with an idea for a great paper or research paper, take some time to read some of the research paper writing services reviews that are out there. You may be able to save yourself a lot of time and money if you know what to look for when searching for an essay writing service.The main place that most people look when they are searching for writing services is in a newspaper. If your paper is picked up by a newspaper, you will see an advertisement for it on the back page of the paper. There are many writing services available today, so look for the writing services ads to get a better idea of what services will fit your needs and expectations.Some of the top search results that are listed when you do a search for writing services are from agencies and schools that offer tutoring services. When you are looking for essay writing services, don't go right to the agencies and schools. Read up on the writing services companies that yo u are interested in and make sure they offer the type of essay that you are hoping to write.Some of the most important things to remember when you are looking for a research paper writing service are the types of essay projects that are available. Although the research paper writing services you will be looking at may be the same, each project will vary slightly. If you want to avoid getting scammed, try to focus on a few different writing services that specialize in different types of papers and research topics.You may find that the writing services that are advertised are all offering you the same types of essays. By concentrating on a few different services, you can be assured that you will be getting a unique work that will be specifically tailored to your needs. This is a great way to ensure that you will be getting exceptional results that are perfectly aligned with your style.Research paper writing services have great resources available to them, so make sure that you ask a l ot of questions before you sign on the dotted line. Most writing services will tell you that they give their clients a free consultation. If you get the chance to meet with their staff, ask them as many questions as you can about how the paper writing services work.Even if you only need someone to edit your research paper writing services reviews before you hire them, you will need to feel comfortable with the person you are going to use to do this. Even the most experienced and highly qualified writers still make mistakes. Make sure that the person you are going to use for this task is someone who has written and edited for other people, or someone who is very familiar with research papers and essay writing.Research paper writing services are usually expensive, but you do not want to get a poor quality writing service that will cost you more than you bargained for. Even if you are working with a specific company, take a look at the writing services reviews that are available and th en go to another writing services company and see if they are a good match for you. If you do find that they are not, go to a third company and see if they are a good match.