Saturday, April 27, 2019

A case brief of the Scottish decision in Robertson v Anderson [2002] Essay

A case brief of the Scottish decision in Robertson v Anderson 2002 ScotCS 312 - Essay ExampleThe trial cost found in favour of the pursuer.In the Court of Session held that there was no argument related to to an intention to effect legal relations. It was argued that a promise or commensurateness would be binding whole if the promisor intended to enter into a legally enforceable agreement. The Court of Session considered the critical have it off to be Whether the talk between the parties amounted to an agreement with binding effect or a statement of incoming intention of a non-binding character?The decision of the Court of Session was that there was a special agreement as to the national prize on previous occasions, and that this pointed to a conclusion that such agreement was bad intended. It was also held that the defenders conduct suggested that she considered the agreement to share the prize and that the parties intended the game to be an informal joint venture which doubl ed their chances of winning the

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.